What do the statistics tell us? Let's take a look. But first, I picked the Hawks to finish the season at 51-31.
Photo source: hectorir |
Team Stats
Offensive Rating (points per 100 possessions): 111.4 (4th in the NBA) [111.9 in 2009]
Defensive Rating (points allowed per 100 possessions): 107.7 (20th) [106.7 in 2009]
Rating Differential: 3.7 [5.2 in 2009]
Points Scored per Game: 101.8 (12th) [101.7 in 2009]
Points Allowed per Game: 98.5 (10th) [97.0 in 2009]
Pace (possessions per game): 91.4 (23rd) [90.1 in 2009]
Player Stats
(in order of minutes played)
Joe Johnson
Offensive Rating: 108 (112 in 2009)
Defensive Rating: 111 (109)
PER: 16.9 (19.3)
Josh Smith
Offensive Rating: 107 (109)
Defensive Rating: 100 (101)
PER: 21.4 (21.0)
Al Horford
Offensive Rating: 134 (121)
Defensive Rating: 106 (105)
PER: 26.3 (19.4)
Mike Bibby
Offensive Rating: 121 (113)
Defensive Rating: 111 (110)
PER: 14.0 (12.7)
Jamal Crawford
Offensive Rating: 111 (114)
Defensive Rating: 111 (110)
PER: 15.0 (18.4)
Marvin Williams
Offensive Rating: 112 (113)
Defensive Rating: 109 (107)
PER: 12.6 (13.0)
Zaza Pachulia
Offensive Rating: 123 (110)
Defensive Rating: 106 (104)
PER: 15.9 (13.1)
Jeff Teague
Offensive Rating: 106 (96)
Defensive Rating: 107 (106)
PER: 13.1 (11.0)
Josh Powell
Offensive Rating: 91 (89)
Defensive Rating: 109 (106)
PER: 8.4 (6.7)
Although down slightly from last season, the efficiency of the Hawks offense has been extremely impressive. At 111.4 points per 100 possessions they rank fourth in the NBA. The trouble is that defensively they are allowing an additional one point per 100 possessions over their 2009/10 season number. As a result of those two marks, Atlanta's differential is down to 3.7 from 5.2.
Looking at individuals, the first thing that stands out is the leap that Horford has taken this season. He's improved his PER by almost seven and his Offensive Rating is an off-the-charts 134. The keys to his improved effectiveness are his stellar 63.7% shooting from the field (up from 55.1%) and his 82.9% free-throw shooting (up from 78.9).
Headed in the other direction is the $120 million man, Joe Johnson. His PER is down 2.4 points and he actually has a negative three rating differential. His three-point shooting percentage has dropped by more than 100 points.
Smith is maintaining the momentum of his big breakout last season. His PER is up .4 from his spectacular 21.0 last season.
Bibby has also improved his PER, from 12.7 in 2009/10 to 14.0. Maybe more important, he has boosted his differential to +10. His field-goal percentage is up almost 70 points in part due to his excellence behind the arc, where he is shooting 43.1%.
While Crawford continues to demand action on his contract his effectiveness is falling. He's following up a strong 2009/10 with an average season. Crawford's three-point shooting is down almost 50 points and he's pulling fewer boards down as well.
Off the bench, Pachulia and Teague have improved. But, if the Hawks are going to make a real run, they'll need Johnson, Crawford and another underperformer, Marvin Williams, to raise their level of play.
How would you rate Atlanta's season so far? Let me know your thoughts by posting a comment below.
No comments:
Post a Comment